Government of Saint Luca

Go to Homepage

[Feedback]

[Site Map]

[Contact Us]

Search this Site

Judge says coverage of Helenites Building affair was: “SCURILLOUS AND CRUEL!”


Governor General
Prime Minister
The Cabinet
The Senate
House of Assembly
St. Lucia Ambassadors
The Constitution
The Staff Orders

National Television Network

Saint Lucia Gazette
Press Releases
Speeches
Features
Notices
Vacancies

Saint Lucia 25th Independence Celebrations

About Saint Lucia
Frequently Asked Questions
Web Links
Government Directory
Browse by Agency
Site Help
Subscribe to NEMO News
Updates to Hurricane Frances

Weather Information Service Number

(758) 454-3452

Wednesday, November 24, 2004 - Retired judge, Justice Albert Matthew, says some of the coverage of the Helenites Building affair was scurrilous and cruel and he did not allow it to influence his findings.


The retired judge was appointed by the Government to investigate the circumstances surrounding the change of ownership of state property and facilitation of a mortgage for that purpose.


The retired judge heard witnesses locally and also travelled to New York to talk to other witnesses there.


The sole investigator issued a 25-page report, in which he outlined the procedure employed in his probe, what he found and what his recommendations were.
Among other things, Justice Matthew looked at the “circumstances involving the attempted transfer of title to the property and facilitation of a mortgage of $150,000.” He also examined “the behaviour of parties involved in these matters.”


On the behaviour of the parties involved, the Judge in his report dated October 25, 2004 said, “In the course of the investigation, both in St. Lucia and in New York, I was shown and referred to various printed matter commenting on the matter under review.”


“Some of these”, he added, were “scurrilous, biased, misinformed and cruel to some of the parties involved in these matters.”


However, the investigator said, “I shall not allow them to influence my findings.”


Unlike some of the conclusions arrived at in the press and in the Internet chat-room of at least one local newspaper, the Judge found that there was no criminal intent.


The Judge’s main conclusion was that “top officers of the administration who wield tremendous power and influence must realize that they are agents of the Government and must in all matters of policy and substance follow the instructions of their principal.”


The investigating, former judge’s full report is available here.

 


Home ] Up ] Search 2004 Press Releases ] [Site Help]

© 2004 Government Information Service. All rights reserved.

Read our privacy guidelines.